On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:48 AM, David Schmitt wrote: > > James Turnbull wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> David Schmitt wrote: >>> Even if that might mean having some .puppettmp file lying around >>> from an >>> aborted filetransfer? >>> >> >> Isn't that implied by certain types of shut-downs? Are you >> suggesting Puppet do some clean-up when someone Ctrl-C's for example? > > "finishing the evaluation/application of the current resource" would > imply that. Yes. But that'll be probably type/provider specific. E.g. > Exec should really cancel the running command?
IMO, if you want a process to exit right now, you use SIGKILL. In the general case, Puppet should do its best to be safe. It sounds a lot like HUP should finish transactions but TERM and INT should only finish the current resource. Any complaints about that behaviour? -- Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft! -- Theodore Roosevelt --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
