On Oct 27, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Ohad Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:00 PM, R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> How was it in 0.24? I think the most sane priority order is:
>>>
>>> - external nodes
>>> - facts
>>> - config file
>>>
>> +1
>
> So this all seems related to this bug of mine:
> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2322
>
> and I had the same impression Luke had in that bug, that we can't
> currently tell whether a given config setting was arrived at via a
> fact, a config file, or a default value?
>
> That being said, I agree with the priority list above.
How would the command line work relative to external nodes?
1) command line
2) external nodes
3) facts
4) config file
5) server-side default
?
This is, um, heinous and hideous. Do we really need that much
flexibility in how people use environments? Is there some way we can
rethink the problem a bit and come up with something cleaner?
--
Venter's First Law:
Discoveries made in a field by some one from another discipline
will
always be upsetting to the majority of those inside.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
