+1.  I'm doing similar dodges to version mungle; it'd be nice to
standardize on the current version.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have an issue with me upgrade the rspec version required by
>> Puppet's tests?
>>
>> 1.2.9 is out and seems to work fine, and someone *cough*Rein*cough*
>> wrote tests that required it somehow, so now I'm stuck with a conflict.
>>
>> I don't see any reason not to use more recent ones...
>>
>
> +1
> I'd happily say goodbye to having to use the `spec _1.2.2_` hack when
> running files directly.
> --
> Bruce Williams
> Developer @ Reductive Labs, http://reductivelabs.com
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.


Reply via email to