On 09/12/09 18:53, Luke Kanies wrote: > On Dec 9, 2009, at 1:58 AM, Thomas Bellman wrote: > >> Markus Roberts wrote: >>> As this is something that you should be doing on a directly >>> controlled >>> machine (i.e., you won't be needing to install rspec on the clients >>> or >>> anything) I'm not seeing where this presents a difficulty. >> >> It's not exactly encouraging occasional developers/patch writers to do >> unit tests, since we will need to install a throw-away machine just to >> run them. > > Hmm, that's a good point. I'd always figured your admin workstation > would be easy to have these gems installed on, but it sounds like > that's not the case. > > What would we need to do to make this easier? Be more flexible on > rspec versions or something?
Indeed, like allowing any version above a version number (ie >= 1.2.x) would be a good start. Note: we have the same issue with mocha. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
