On 13 June 2010 18:38, Jesse A Wolfe <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, I've certainly been bitten by this. > an executable that fails because you're in the wrong directory feels > brittle, and I'm in favor of any change that makes the tests less likely to > fail for surprising reasons. > (an alternate suggestion would be to have spec_helper make sure the working > directory is something sane, but I prefer the rename, as it's the more > conventional ruby solution)
OK, if this is the plan I'll do this in facter too as I'd prefer that convention also Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
