On Sep 23, 2010, at 9:23, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote:
> R.I.Pienaar wrote: >> ----- "James Turnbull"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Mathias Gug wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Excerpts from Markus Roberts's message of Thu Sep 23 00:53:27 -0400 >>> 2010: >>>>> I inadvertently left some tickets off the "Ready for Testing" >>> list: >>>>> #2224 (http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2224) Add an Expire >>> parameter >>>>> to the User type reference >>>>> #4258 (http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4258) Add pkgutil >>> provider >>>> Why are there new features pushed in point releases? >>>> >>> One is a customer requested feature and the second is a "feature" in >>> name only - the current pkgutil provider is broken. >> >> >> so the one shouldnt be included? >> >> > > Customers who pay for support get priority tasking on features - our current > model is into the next shipped release where possible. This may change in > the future as it presents some challenges. This has largely always been our practice, but it has not come up all that often, and it's only ever applied to berry simple features such as the one mentioned. We've been wondering internally how long we'll get away with it, so let us know if you think that ship has sailed. -- http://puppetlabs.com/ | +1-615-594-8199 | @puppetmasterd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
