> It was a joke with a point - ralsh takes parameters, although it might > ignore them in the case of when you don't specify a single resource. >
It presently appears to assume that you specified an individual resource if you specify parameters, and thus fails if you didn't (which is reasonable, though not the only possible interpretation of that combination). We could reclaim that case for search/selection parameters (Jesse's "the data problem") but I'm a little uneasy about having something that sets and something that tests use the same syntax. The "traditional" solution would be to have x=y set x to y, x==y select resource where x was already y, and then add x<=y, x!=y, x=~y, and so on. That could be quite workable, if we ever fine the need to go there... -- M ----------------------------------------------------------- The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. ~George Bernard Shaw ------------------------------------------------------------ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
