I've added the ticket #5290. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Brice Figureau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On 12/11/10 04:13, Matt Robinson wrote: >> Brice, I see you haven't had time to write tests for this patch, and I >> understand it's not very high priority. I'd hate to see this patch >> languish on the list since it's fairly simple, fixes an issue, and is >> hard to test because of it's relationship with RDoc. I'd be okay with >> merging this in and opening a separate ticket as a reminder to write >> some tests for this file. Would anyone object to that? > > I believe this patch was merged in 2.6.x a couple of days ago. I don't > have any objection about adding a "test this code" ticket. > -- > Brice Figureau > My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
