On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Stefan Schulte <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is the next iteration of my patches. All the previous commits are now > just one single commit. I hope I corrected all the spelling errors in the > type and provider code. > > I now also use the two arguments form of raise_error. That was a great > tip because it showed a few bugs in validate methods ;-) > > The unit tests all pass on my system (Linux). But because of #5605 the type > is currently now useable. The second commit introduces new integration > tests that will fail because of #5605. > About the name: > I don't like port either, but I dont like nss_*. I think that nss could be > an alternative provider that can also talk to a db or whatever is configured > in nsswitch. And that nss provider can then be used on any system that > supports nss. > > Personally I prefer 'net_service' as the resource name.
Me too. NSS anything is clearly the wrong name for a *type*. net_service works for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
