On May 16, 2011, at 12:38 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > Randall Hansen wrote: >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nick Lewis<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> IIRC the intent was for >>> external faces that were being developed by a user not to affect the >>> functionality of core Puppet. >> >> I agree with this. If a Puppet user installs one bad Face it >> shouldn't prevent him working with all other Faces. > > I agree with Randall - especially as there is currently no easy way to > load/unload/distribute Faces.
Face distribution is easy with pluginsync, and bad faces will get removed from clients if they're rmoved from the server. -- It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy. -- Groucho Marx --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies -|- http://puppetlabs.com -|- http://about.me/lak -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
