On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ken Barber <[email protected]> wrote: >> the thing I need to do better in mco is write a package maintainers >> guide to make it clear to people how to undo the bundling as there's >> been some mistakes made where people just werent aware we did it this >> way but on the whole how mco does it worked out really well for us. >> The guide should be in the top level or in the top level README or >> something > > Have we explored this at all within Puppet? What is the preferred > pattern in Puppet today, and do we see an advantage in adopting a > similar pattern? >
Not as far as I know. There are two things vendored in puppet that I am aware of and I don't know how distros deal with them: SemVer and Trollop. Vendoring this kind of stuff might be another good usecase for getting bundler into the puppet repo. It would declare our dependencies and then the packager can determine whether to make those as package dependencies or to just directly make them part of the package. > ken. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
