On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Andy Parker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ken Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> the thing I need to do better in mco is write a package maintainers > >> guide to make it clear to people how to undo the bundling as there's > >> been some mistakes made where people just werent aware we did it this > >> way but on the whole how mco does it worked out really well for us. > >> The guide should be in the top level or in the top level README or > >> something > > > > Have we explored this at all within Puppet? What is the preferred > > pattern in Puppet today, and do we see an advantage in adopting a > > similar pattern? > > > > Not as far as I know. There are two things vendored in puppet that I > am aware of and I don't know how distros deal with them: SemVer and > Trollop. > SemVer is not a bundled dependency so much as it is a part of Puppet that should be split off and published separately. > Vendoring this kind of stuff might be another good usecase for getting > bundler into the puppet repo. It would declare our dependencies and > then the packager can determine whether to make those > as package dependencies or to just directly make them part of the package. > > > ken. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
