On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:41 PM, David Schmitt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-10-30 16:25, Jeff McCune wrote: >> >> Are there any "nightly" rpms or some-such around? >> >> >> Unfortunately we don't have nightly RPM builds at this point in time. >> It's definitely on our list of things we'd like to provide. I may >> look into this as part of my community focus, do you think nightly RPM's >> would help make community contributions easier? What sort of things are >> you looking for from the nightly RPM's? A repository? Channels for >> 2.7.x, 3.x and master? Just master? > > > In this particular case (and my client's installation/situation) a nightly > 2.7.x rpm would enable pre-rc testing of the performance improvements. > > As it is now, I'll probably won't be on-site before the RCs are cut and > dried. > > > More generally speaking, I'm coming to the conviction that community testing > requires testable artifacts as near as possible to the form of production > artifacts. That is, if it is expected to install something as a package, a > testable version must also be a package. >
We've come to a similar conclusion and there has been some work toward that end. I think we are still a little ways off of getting nightly RPM builds, though. > > Best Regards, David > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
