On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:19 PM, R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ----- "Brian Gallew" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> in nodes and have them propagate to their children, then I submit that > >> nodes are so fundamentally broken as to make node inheritance > >> completely useless, in which case node inheritance should be pulled. > > > > that sums it up well. > > ++ > > I haven't even told my users that nodes can do inheritance, as I > haven't yet come across any reason to do so. > you guys don't use an external node classifier? Is there a reason you prefer to declare nodes? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<puppet-users%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- > nigel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<puppet-users%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
