On May 23, 8:14 pm, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: > Have you considered just pinning this package via a file and requiring that > before this resource?
I have, and already implemented that, thanks! :) However I can already think of other situations where being able to extend existing types would be desirable and make managing various things simpler and more direct. I plan on spending some time trying to write some simple types and providers to hopefully learn a bit more about what's going on and why my initial approaches have all failed, but I would be greatly appreciative of pointers and/or links to more documentation or examples. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
