On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Hercynium <sscaff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 23, 8:14 pm, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: > > Have you considered just pinning this package via a file and requiring > that > > before this resource? > > I have, and already implemented that, thanks! :) However I can already > think of other situations where being able to extend existing types > would be desirable and make managing various things simpler and more > direct. > > I plan on spending some time trying to write some simple types and > providers to hopefully learn a bit more about what's going on and why > my initial approaches have all failed, but I would be greatly > appreciative of pointers and/or links to more documentation or > examples. > I believe we actually have a feature request in for the apt provider to do what you've asked for btw. The approach you outlined in the initial mail looks like it should work at first glance, can you post some more info about the actual errors you get trying these different methods? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
