On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jeff McCune <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perhaps it might be useful to set resource defaults only for the local > scope, and not for any classes which get included into this scope. > How do you feel about this change to the language? So this would mean that you'd only be able to set truly global resource defaults with an import in site.pp? and no longer inside a base class that includes all your other classes? We make use of the current behavior of defaults being applied to included classes quite a lot, and I find it useful just to provide a counterpoint to RIP :) > > Is there some other organization of the class structure I'm overlooking? > > Thanks for your feedback, > -- > Jeff McCune > http://www.puppetlabs.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
