On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jeff McCune <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Perhaps it might be useful to set resource defaults only for the local >> scope, and not for any classes which get included into this scope. >> How do you feel about this change to the language? > > So this would mean that you'd only be able to set truly global > resource defaults with an import in site.pp? and no longer inside a > base class that includes all your other classes? > > We make use of the current behavior of defaults being applied to > included classes quite a lot, and I find it useful just to provide a > counterpoint to RIP :)
How do you "know" what the scope is of those included classes will end up as? Are you not including the "edge" classes multiple times? -- Jeff McCune http://www.puppetlabs.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
