On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We really need community testing with this provider. There are some
>> questions Rudy has in the ticket log that we need to get answered.
>>
>> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4258
>
> Hi, I'm the author of pkgutil, I'm glad you're about to support it in
> Puppet since I get quite many requests for that.
>
> Unfortunately, I know nothing of Puppet or Python so I haven't been
> able to help out my users there but if there's anything you want to
> know about pkgutil or if you want something added/changed I will do my
> best to help. The (much faster) --single option came from such a
> request by Maciej Blizinski who contributed a new provider.
>
> I think the issue with "Not installed" vs. "notinst" is probably from
> converting the pkg-get provider, if I'm not mistaken pkg-get prints
> "Not installed" so that should just be "notinst" instead. I'm thinking
> about adding an option for machine parseable output to make these
> things better.

Hi Peter, it's awesome to have you here.

We *love* machine parseable output in Puppet land :)



>
> I have changed the exit code to 0 (Rudy #10).
>
> /peter
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>



-- 
Nigel Kersten - Puppet Labs -  http://www.puppetlabs.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to