having the same oppinion - i'm curious to see something from dyne:bolic can be compaired with PuppyLinux or DamnSmallLinux - like a light version of it, usink pekwm, jwm, lxde, etc.
On 3/7/09, Antonios Galanopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > hello, > > Pure:dyne reccomended hardware is at least PIII. Most of the audio/video > soft > that comes with it will not be very usefull otherwise. It runs nicely on a > bunch > of X22 laptops that we got around here and its ok for audio but definatelly > not > for video. A very important thing to have in my opinion is RAM. finding ram > for > old salvaged computers is not hard so make sure that you top them up with as > much ram you can get your hands. > >> My suggestion would be a really light version of pure:dyne (i don't >> know how hard is it to do), being as light as PuppyLinux or TinyLinux >> are, and using window managers like LXDE, Fluxbox, PekWM, etc. as >> choices... > > it is super easy to cutomise p:d and change the window manager. This will > make a > huge different I think. dwm and evilwm are already in there from the small > wm > department. the rest you will have to install them. > > a > >> >> What do you all think about? >> Thanks! >> >> --- >> [email protected] >> irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne >> > | > |'`'. .''. .. > | ' .' '. .` '. > |-----`.----.'------- '------------. > | '..' `. ' > | `..' > | > > --- > [email protected] > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne > --- [email protected] irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
