But did you tested specifically the 2.6.26-8-rt16 kernel? As 2.6.29 is almost out I don't think it's worth investing time on the 2.6.26 one, but I'm installing it at the Uni and am hoping it will not crash.
2009/4/2 Aymeric Mansoux <[email protected]> > Ricardo . said : > > About the kernel thing, in case someone doesn't know this > site: > > > > http://www.osadl.org/ > > Latest-Stable.latest-stable-realtime-linux.0.html > > > > I'm using it and all seems to be working perfectly. > > > > Ricardo > > Thanks Ricardo, > While testing our 2.6.26 rt config (or other flavours), a few users > (LAT mailing list) reported hard lockups. > So we stuck with 2.6.24. > > 2.6.29 seems to be a winner though. > > > > > > > The side effect of this is that we cannot always pick the most recent > > > kernel, for example leek and potato has been release with 2.6.24 and > not > > > 2.6.26 because the latest had really poor RT performances and hard > > > lockups in some cases, so we were waiting for 2.6.29, which has been > > > released recently to work on a new RT kernel for pure:dyne. In the end, > > > it's also our choice to provide something that will work perfectly for > > > fewer people, instead of something that will work poorly for everyone. > > > And maybe the overall distribution should reflect that as well... > > > > > --- > > [email protected] > > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne > > --- > [email protected] > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne >
--- [email protected] irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
