Ricardo . said :
>           Isn't the rt-patch already out? Just saw it on the kernel.org
> server...
> 
>   http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.29-rt3.bz2

02-Apr-2009!
and rt3 is fresh :)

Yes indeed, it's been out for a couple of weeks now, sorry didn't pay
attention.... So I guess we'll try it soonish...



> 
>                   Ricardo
>  
> 2009/4/2 Aymeric Mansoux <[email protected]>
> 
>     Ricardo . said :
>     >     But did you tested specifically the 2.6.26-8-rt16 kernel?
> 
>     yes.
> 
> 
>     > As 2.6.29 is
>     > almost out I don't think it's worth investing time on the 2.6.26 one, 
> but
>     I'm
>     > installing it at the Uni and am hoping it will not crash.
> 
>     yes yes, of course, we are waiting for an rt patch for 2.6.29 now.
>     Vanilla is already working very nicely.
> 
>     a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     > 2009/4/2 Aymeric Mansoux <[email protected]>
>     >
>     >     Ricardo . said :
>     >     >               About the kernel thing, in case someone doesn't know
>     this
>     >     site:
>     >     >
>     >     >              http://www.osadl.org/
>     >     > Latest-Stable.latest-stable-realtime-linux.0.html
>     >     >
>     >     >               I'm using it and all seems to be working perfectly.
>     >     >
>     >     >                    Ricardo
>     >
>     >     Thanks Ricardo,
>     >     While testing our 2.6.26 rt config (or other flavours), a few users
>     >     (LAT mailing list) reported hard lockups.
>     >     So we stuck with 2.6.24.
>     >
>     >     2.6.29 seems to be a winner though.
>     >
>     >
>     >     >
>     >     > >  The side effect of this is that we cannot always pick the most
>     recent
>     >     > > kernel, for example leek and potato has been release with 2.6.24
>     and
>     >     not
>     >     > > 2.6.26 because the latest had really poor RT performances and
>     hard
>     >     > > lockups in some cases, so we were waiting for 2.6.29, which has
>     been
>     >     > > released recently to work on a new RT kernel for pure:dyne. In
>     the end,
>     >     > > it's also our choice to provide something that will work
>     perfectly for
>     >     > > fewer people, instead of something that will work poorly for
>     everyone.
>     >     > > And maybe the overall distribution should reflect that as 
> well...
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     > ---
>     >     > [email protected]
>     >     > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
>     >
>     >     ---
>     >     [email protected]
>     >     irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
>     >
>     >
> 
>     > ---
>     > [email protected]
>     > irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
> 
>     ---
>     [email protected]
>     irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne
> 
> 

> ---
> [email protected]
> irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne

---
[email protected]
irc.goto10.org #pure:dyne

Reply via email to