2010/9/16 Claude Heiland-Allen <[email protected]>: > On 15/09/10 22:05, Timmi wrote: >> >> >> DanS wrote: >>> >>> The latest is based on karmic; yes, we're planning on a lucid version, >>> we're (gradually) updating all the packages for lucid (and >>> maverick...) as we go >> >> Since 10.04 is a LTS release, it causes me concern that you said you'll >> make >> the upgrades to Lucid and Maverick. >> >> Will there be pure ubuntu 10-04 (/lubuntu) based system, and not a mix? >> So >> that we could benefit from a stable release with long term support? > > It won't be a mixed system, as that is likely to cause more trouble than its > worth. > > The next live distribution (liveCD/liveDVD/liveUSB) will be based on > Maverick, but we'll also make all the packages available in the PPA for > Lucid - so you can install Lucid whichever way you want (for example, I > personally start from the 'mini.iso' installer giving a very minimal system) > and add any other Ubuntu or Puredyne packages that you need on top. > >> I don't want to be a guinea pig for ridiculous "improvements" that I don't >> need or want. I've tried all versions since the last LTS (but under Linux >> Mint that is), and I couldn't wait for the next LTS to finally come out so >> I >> can stop reinstalling and just settle in with a system that is tweaked and >> works well and doesn't have to be changed anymore for a while. I'm >> running >> Mint now, btw, and the LTS is just fiiiine. (however, the extras in >> puredyne sure sound nice!) > > Yes, it makes sense to use an LTS/stable version for an installed system, > however for a live system (the main focus of Puredyne) it makes more sense > to use the latest version as a base. > > Thanks, > > > Claude > > --- > [email protected] > http://identi.ca/group/puredyne > irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne >
Theres so much difference between 10.04 and 10.10? I will stay with Lucid... -- JM Jones --- [email protected] http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
