Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > It won't be a mixed system, as that is likely to cause more trouble than > its worth. > Yes, it makes sense to use an LTS/stable version for an installed > system, however for a live system (the main focus of Puredyne) it makes > more sense to use the latest version as a base.
Are you going to maintain a version based on 10.04 and considering it as an installable, given it's LTS, while you send off every few months the ones that you consider Live? With other distros anyways, the Live system was always to try before you install to HDD. This is the first time I see a mission statement that it is not to be suitable or stable enough to be considered for permanent install. -- View this message in context: http://puredyne.466513.n3.nabble.com/puredyne-version-of-puredyne-tp958144p1535393.html Sent from the Puredyne mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --- [email protected] http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
