2010/11/14 rosea.grammostola <[email protected]>: > On 11/14/2010 12:58 PM, Dan S wrote: >> >> Good point - I don't think there are any metapackages (others might >> correct me). That would be rather handy for ubuntu folks who want the >> very cool stuff. >> >> I'm not going to have any time to look into it but - anyone want to >> contribute a metapackage? Either for 9.11 (since it's stable) or >> 10.10... I think it's something an external contributor could put >> together and it would make many people happy :) >> > > Then it would be nice if the puredyne packages for 10.10 can be backported > to 10.04, so you can choose to use 10.04 if you want. Is it possible and / > or are more people interested in this?
Yes, we're doing packaging for both lucid and maverick at the moment - so if there's a package we make for maverick which we haven't made for lucid, consider it a bug and please complain :) This means that the metapackage suggestion would be really nice for 10.04 people, as you suggest... Dan --- [email protected] http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
