On 11/14/2010 01:32 PM, Dan S wrote:
2010/11/14 rosea.grammostola<[email protected]>:
On 11/14/2010 12:58 PM, Dan S wrote:
Good point - I don't think there are any metapackages (others might
correct me). That would be rather handy for ubuntu folks who want the
very cool stuff.
I'm not going to have any time to look into it but - anyone want to
contribute a metapackage? Either for 9.11 (since it's stable) or
10.10... I think it's something an external contributor could put
together and it would make many people happy :)
Then it would be nice if the puredyne packages for 10.10 can be backported
to 10.04, so you can choose to use 10.04 if you want. Is it possible and /
or are more people interested in this?
Yes, we're doing packaging for both lucid and maverick at the moment -
so if there's a package we make for maverick which we haven't made for
lucid, consider it a bug and please complain :) This means that the
metapackage suggestion would be really nice for 10.04 people, as you
suggest...
If this is true and packages which are there for 10.10 will be there for
10.04, I might start working on a beginning of making the metapackages
via the debian blends-dev package. But someone else have to maintain it
and edit it for 10.10, cause I don't use puredyne a lot...
\r
---
[email protected]
http://identi.ca/group/puredyne
irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
