On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 11:59 +0100, Alexander Zeidler wrote: > On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 10:29 +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > > any reason this is relevant you might want to add to the commit > > message here? > to avoid a failing null check and its error message. This confused > users since the activation was successful anyway. > > > > simple > > > > return; > > > > is slightly preferred for returning undef > I considered using it, but then saw the established use of undef. > Thanks! > v2: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-January/061506.html
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
