>>I don't really understand that. I thought we will only migrate local disks.
>>it makes no
>>sense to migrate a shared disk to a local storage?
It was in case of my 2nd proposal of new vmid for target.
The advantage was that each vm.conf have their own local disk. (no orphans disk
in case of node failure during a migration for example)
----- Mail original -----
De: "dietmar" <diet...@proxmox.com>
À: "aderumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>
Cc: "pve-devel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Envoyé: Mardi 18 Octobre 2016 11:07:37
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/3] add live storage migration with vm migration
> > The only drawback is that we can't mix local && shared storage in this
> > case.
> > (but I think that if user have shared storage, he don't have need of local
> > storage migration)
> >>Not sure if this is a good restriction (Maybe this is a major use case).
> Note that you can have sourcevm (local + shared), destination vm :
> sourcevm (local + shared), destination vm : destination local + same shared
> (but with new volume)
I don't really understand that. I thought we will only migrate local disks.
it makes no
sense to migrate a shared disk to a local storage?
pve-devel mailing list