>Nexenta CE may only be used for testing May i ask why? I have 3 supermicro storages running Nexenta CE 3.x (4.x beta is too unstable, but that's why it called "beta") and i haven't see any problems with iscsi+lvm for KVM and NFS for VZ containers. Especially after we separated storage switches (was pretty hard at old office).
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013, at 07:36 AM, Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH wrote: > Nexenta CE may only be used for testing, not allowed for production. > > If you go for a cheap but reliable SAN, look after Promise VessRAID > machines. > > If you don’t want to spend any money, have a look at freenas which is > pretty nice, full featured and uses ZFS in the back. > > Ceph is probably nice, but overkill for SMB. I am talking about the case, > that something fails and you have to fix a complex system instead of > using another (fallback) NFS or iSCSI device. > > Marco > > > > > > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Muhammad Yousuf > Khan > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. August 2013 14:10 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [PVE-User] SAN recommendation. > > Need any experience suggestion. > We want a SMB SAN storage and a bit convenient in price. with HA and > Multipathing for iSCSI > do you guys think openfiler could be a good option for production or it > is just good for testing? > Thanks, > Myk > _______________________________________________ > > pve-user mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
