On 10/06/2016 11:51 AM, Kevin Lemonnier wrote:
Yes, I would find that logical. And perhaps also a third option: to
disable-HA management, so we can work on a machine, without having to
completely remove it from the HA system.
That's not a bid idea. I assume we all make the mistake for the same reason :
trying to disable HA without losing the comment and having to figure out the id
again.
I personnaly use the comment to put the machine name, since the id isn't really
that great to identify the VM for me in the list.
Yes, as I wrote in another answer be thought about that a bit, to me
this discussion shows that it has use cases.
But adding something to HA is not always straight forward.
You have to think about a lot possible side effects and that cluster
wide not only regarding the local node, what happens on
fencing/failures, ...
But we will definitively reevaluate if we should add it! No promise yet,
though :)
cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
