On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:35:41PM +0000, Tobias Brandvik wrote: > > Do you happen to have PVFS mounted also? > > I'm relatively new to parallel filesystems (new to filesystems in > general actually), but I take it this means using PVFS through the VFS > interface by building the kernel modules and so on? If so, no.
That's right. Excellent. Then I think we understand exactly why these failed. > So HDF5 itself should be ok - it's only the test itself that's buggy? Yes. We're working with the HDF5 guys to come up with better versions of these tests. Thanks much for the report! > I had to skip a few tests to get everything working: > Skipping -- parallel extend Chunked allocation on serial file (calloc) > Skipping -- parallel read of dataset written serially with filters (fltread) > Skipping -- compressed dataset collective read (cmpdsetr) These are new tests with 1.6.6, and I think we know why these fail. > Skipping -- big dataset test (bigdset) > Skipping -- collective irregular contiguous write (ccontw) > Skipping -- collective irregular contiguous read (ccontr) I think these tests used to pass in 1.6.5. I'll double check them. Thanks again! ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF Argonne National Lab, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
