>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:00:42 -0400 (EDT) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from >[Julian Rohrhuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 24 15:00:40 2001 >Received: from rzaixsrv2.rrz.uni-hamburg.de >(rzaixsrv2.rrz.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.32.71]) > by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26681 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:00:39 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from [134.100.45.210] (max2-210.dialin.uni-hamburg.de >[134.100.45.210]) > by rzaixsrv2.rrz.uni-hamburg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id >f9OJ0aw38184 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 21:00:36 +0200 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Message-Id: <f04310102b7fcbebc7a51@[134.100.45.240]> >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:55:31 +0200 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Julian Rohrhuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [pws] Re: image as clickable link in Comanche? >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > > > > >*+gfx_by_gimp.gif+*>http://www.gimp.org/ > > > >or > > > >**+gfx_by_gimp.gif+*>http://www.gimp.org/* > > > > > >Neither of which work. It's actually something of a dilemma: Ned's > >version is simpler, but requires html knowledge, while the others are > >pure Comanche, but would require a bit of work and seem to me harder to > >get your head around. > > > >I'm not sure they'd really be on my wish list, but as I'm running 1.1 > >now, it'll have to go down for 1.2 ;-) > >something like >*+image.gif+>http://link.org* >would be very logic and definitely on my whish list (:
-------------------------- Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta, GA 30332-0280 Associate Professor - Learning Sciences & Technologies. Collaborative Software Lab - http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/ (404) 894-5618 : Fax (404) 894-0673 : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty/Mark.Guzdial.html
