Hi Ralf, On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 16:11 +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:48 PM, holger krekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't have a strong opinion on this. But for python 2.3 and > > 2.4 i guess it's somewhat nice to be able to type "python setup.py install" > > and have it work indepedently from the question if > > setuptools is installed. > > > > setuptools enabled packages come with a short bootstrap module which > does install setuptools in case it is not installed. This should also > work with python 2.3. > (I think you will also need vs 6.0 instead of vs 2003 to build > extensions for python 2.3 on windows)
ok. if we want to ship with a pre-compiled greenlet module we would need to distribute per-python versions, right? If we can't manage this ourselves then i hope we can find people to prepare binary eggs. > > originally the greenlet lib was moved into the py lib > > to ease maintenance and because it was used in PyPy and > > we didn't want to add dependencies there. > > > > Today, I'd be fine both ways - for 0.9.2 i guess > > greenlets should still be part of the py lib, though. > > > > ok. I'll try to implement a setuptools based setup.py then. any chances you'll get to that this week? I think i'd like to get the 0.9.2 release out the coming weekend. cheers, holger _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
