Hi Armin, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:51 +0200, Armin Rigo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:36:42AM +0200, holger krekel wrote: > > some of you know that i am considering licensing and general > > funding issues recently, see here for the current licensing status: > > > > http://codespeak.net/py/trunk/faq.html#whygpl > > > > However, i am considering releasing the execnet code under the > > GPL and the the rest under the LGPL. > > I don't know if it is possible to change the license without agreement > from all parties that already contributed code. I would be rather > opposed, in principle, to seeing my own code (12% of execnet, according > to svn blame) being re-licensed LGPL or GPL.
my understanding: Your contributions - e.g. most of rsync.py - would remain MIT licensed. Execnet distributed as a whole package could only be used under the GPL (if i GPL my parts and future work), however. Does that match your understanding? best, holger _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
