Hi Holger, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:07:58PM +0200, holger krekel wrote: > my understanding: Your contributions - e.g. most of rsync.py - > would remain MIT licensed. Execnet distributed as a whole > package could only be used under the GPL (if i GPL my parts > and future work), however. Does that match your understanding?
I'm afraid not; I'm thinking notably about the reorganization of the execnet code I did long ago (around r13661), which still leaves e.g. 109 lines from me in channel.py (30%). I'm not really going to enforce my position in any way because I'm happy to stick with old versions of execnet for my own usage, but I'm just saying that I would informally consider this as *slightly* unfair reuse of my part of the work. Well, you might want to investigate the position of other people too (e.g. cfbolz and jan, who also have lines in channel.py). A bientot, Armin. _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
