Hi Leonardo, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:52:44PM -0300, Leonardo Santagada wrote: > I want to know why PyPy doesn't use the unladen swallow benchmarks in > complement to the ones already there and maybe reuse and extend their > reporting tools. This could make comparing results easier and divide > the work of creating comprehensive benchmarks for python.
A number of benchmarks are not applicable to us, or they are uninteresting at this point (e.g. pickling, regexp, or just microbenchmarks...). That would leave 2 usable benchmarks, at a first glance: 'ai', and possibly 'spitfire/slowspitfire'. (Btw, I wonder why they think that richards is "too artificial" when they include a number of microbenchmarks that look far more artificial to me...) A bientot, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-...@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
