On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:49 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2009/9/27 Leonardo Santagada <santag...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: >> >>> Hi Leonardo, >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:52:44PM -0300, Leonardo Santagada wrote: >>>> I want to know why PyPy doesn't use the unladen swallow >>>> benchmarks in >>>> complement to the ones already there and maybe reuse and extend >>>> their >>>> reporting tools. This could make comparing results easier and >>>> divide >>>> the work of creating comprehensive benchmarks for python. >>> >>> A number of benchmarks are not applicable to us, or they are >>> uninteresting at this point (e.g. pickling, regexp, or just >>> microbenchmarks...). >> >> Uninteresting for benchmarking the jit, but important for python >> users. > > Well, at the moment it's not actually possible to use the unladen > swallow benchmarks because the JIT has no thread support.
just for the record threads are being used for memory benchmarking, and I think that could be made using processes. -- Leonardo Santagada santagada at gmail.com _______________________________________________ pypy-...@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
