On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:28:40PM +1000, James Bunton wrote:
> If you have any troubles with this please let me know this week. Unless
> there's any major troubles I'm planning a release next Monday for
> PyMSNt 0.9.4 and 0.10.
The housekeeping/auto-update breaks on a new installation:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "main.py", line 298, in ?
housekeep.init()
File "[...]/PyMSNt/src/housekeep.py", line 24, in init
notes.save()
File "[...]/PyMSNt/src/housekeep.py", line 48, in save
f = open(self.filename, "w")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '..//<transport
JID>/notes_to_myself'
I guess it's because the spool directory (i.e. config.spooldir + "/" +
config.jid) has not yes been created when the housekeeping is run.
The auto-updating to hashed directories works perfectly on an existing
installation. Furthermore, I've been using the avatars branch for quite
some time without any new issues.
Best regards,
Lars
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 16:50:08 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars T. Mikkelsen)
Date: Sat Aug 20 16:50:11 2005
Subject: [py-transports] PyMSNt 0.9.4 & 0.10 testing
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Lavanant Etienne wrote:
> Arnaud Ab?lard a ?crit :
>
> >I installed PyMSNt 0.10 avatars branch and i noticed that the avatars
> >don't work at all with pandion. It's weird though, because Pandion
> >usually uses an icon showing what client the contact uses if now
> >avatar is available, but with PyMSNt 0.10 the avatar isn't displayed
> >and the client icons isn't either, i just get a missing image...
> >
> >I've seen ppl talk about pandion here before, can anyone reproduce the
> >bug? i'm using Pandion 2.1.1 which is the latest.
> >
> >Arnaud
>
>
> I think this is not a bug. I think it is because Pandion uses
> "JEP-0008:Iq-based avatars" and PyMSN-t uses "JEP-0153:vCard-based avatars".
> To be confirmed...
When I tested Pandion some time ago, receiving avatars worked fine. As
far as I remember, Pandion supports JEP-0008 for sending and receiving
avatars and JEP-0153 for receiving avatars.
Best regards,
Lars
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 17:27:04 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vladimir Vrzic)
Date: Sat Aug 20 17:27:47 2005
Subject: [py-transports] Default avatar for PyAIM and PyICQ
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 10:55 -0700, Robert B Quattlebaum, Jr. wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 5:15 AM, Daniel Henninger wrote:
>
> > So does anyone have any suggestions for a good default avatar for
> > PyAIM and PyICQ? MSN's is pretty. ;D AIM and ICQ don't have
> > nearly as pretty of logos IMO, but they could probably be shined up
> > a bit and made to be pretty. I'm not sure what would be good, so
> > I'd like to hear what ideas folk have. Thanks! =)
>
> How about this one?
I think some sort of a Jabber logo would be more appropriate. After all,
it would be mostly AIM/ICQ users who would see this avatar, and so they
would know that the other side is using a Jabber transport.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 19:15:03 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Henninger)
Date: Sat Aug 20 19:15:03 2005
Subject: [py-transports] Default avatar for PyAIM and PyICQ
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There are two separate avatars that are used. One of them is indeed a
Jabber oriented logo. That is the one that actual AIM users would
theoretically see. There's another avatar that the PyAIM user would see
if the user on the other end did not have an avatar at all. In other
words, if you are the one using Jabber/PyAIM, and neither of you had an
avatar, you would see an AIM looking logo and they would see a Jabber
looking logo.
Daniel
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 13:27, Vladimir Vrzic wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 10:55 -0700, Robert B Quattlebaum, Jr. wrote:
> > On Aug 17, 2005, at 5:15 AM, Daniel Henninger wrote:
> >
> > > So does anyone have any suggestions for a good default avatar for
> > > PyAIM and PyICQ? MSN's is pretty. ;D AIM and ICQ don't have
> > > nearly as pretty of logos IMO, but they could probably be shined up
> > > a bit and made to be pretty. I'm not sure what would be good, so
> > > I'd like to hear what ideas folk have. Thanks! =)
> >
> > How about this one?
>
> I think some sort of a Jabber logo would be more appropriate. After all,
> it would be mostly AIM/ICQ users who would see this avatar, and so they
> would know that the other side is using a Jabber transport.
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> py-transports@blathersource.org
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>
>
