On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:23:58PM -0300, Gonzalo Barrio wrote: > I think that not always newer is better, but, I don't remember when > someone said that python2.4 was working slower than 2.3 That's why my > question. > The performance benchmark is if someone has more than 700 concurrent > users. I have only 60 or 80 users online. > I'm gonna do some test with my server. > Anyway are you using 2.4 ?
I use 2.3, but then again I haven't updated pymsn-t for a long time either. I think 2.3 is the default in Debian unstable so that's why I haven't switched. I'd be very interested to see benchmarks. But I don't have time to make them at the moment; I'd rather add new features to pymsn-t, if I had time! -- Andreas [ http://unstable.nl | xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ callto:ils.seconix.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://modevia.com/pipermail/py-transports/attachments/20051108/5f88e85d/attachment.pgp From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 8 15:44:41 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Henninger) Date: Tue Nov 8 15:44:55 2005 Subject: [py-transports] What python version tu use In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I actually ran into a lot of slowness with Python 2.4. I really have no idea why. I mean it could be anything from the way I compiled it, to pure dumb luck, so I'd also be interested in some sort of benchmarks. Daniel On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Gonzalo Barrio wrote: > I think that not always newer is better, but, I don't remember when > someone said that python2.4 was working slower than 2.3 That's why > my question. > The performance benchmark is if someone has more than 700 > concurrent users. I have only 60 or 80 users online. > I'm gonna do some test with my server. > Anyway are you using 2.4 ? > > Thanks > > Andreas van Cranenburgh wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:06:38PM -0300, Gonzalo Barrio wrote: >> >>> I am using python2.3 but I like to know what version of python is >>> better. >>> Somebody did a benchmark or something ? >>> >> >> I think newer is usually better. Otherwise they might just as well >> stop >> developing :P (kidding) >> >> A benchmark wouldn't be that hard. Run pymsn-t for an hour with each >> python version (eg. by editing the #!/usr/bin/python headers to >> contain >> the version number). Use your favorite utility to look at memery >> usage, >> cpu time, etc. Eg. top, or in gnome System Monitor, or whatever you'd >> use. Good luck and publish the results ;) >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> py-transports mailing list >> py-transports@blathersource.org >> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports >> > > > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > py-transports@blathersource.org > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports > >