On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:23:58PM -0300, Gonzalo Barrio wrote:
> I think that not always newer is better, but, I don't remember when 
> someone said that python2.4 was working slower than 2.3 That's why my 
> question.
> The performance benchmark is if someone has more than 700 concurrent 
> users. I have only 60 or 80 users online.
> I'm gonna do some test with my server.
> Anyway are you using 2.4 ?

I use 2.3, but then again I haven't updated pymsn-t for a long time
either. I think 2.3 is the default in Debian unstable so that's why I
haven't switched.

I'd be very interested to see benchmarks. But I don't have time to make
them at the moment; I'd rather add new features to pymsn-t, if I had
time!

-- 
        Andreas        [ http://unstable.nl | xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
                       [  callto:ils.seconix.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://modevia.com/pipermail/py-transports/attachments/20051108/5f88e85d/attachment.pgp
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Nov  8 15:44:41 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Henninger)
Date: Tue Nov  8 15:44:55 2005
Subject: [py-transports] What python version tu use
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I actually ran into a lot of slowness with Python 2.4.  I really have  
no idea why.  I mean it could be anything from the way I compiled it,  
to pure dumb luck, so I'd also be interested in some sort of benchmarks.

Daniel

On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Gonzalo Barrio wrote:

> I think that not always newer is better, but, I don't remember when  
> someone said that python2.4 was working slower than 2.3 That's why  
> my question.
> The performance benchmark is if someone has more than 700  
> concurrent users. I have only 60 or 80 users online.
> I'm gonna do some test with my server.
> Anyway are you using 2.4 ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andreas van Cranenburgh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:06:38PM -0300, Gonzalo Barrio wrote:
>>
>>> I am using python2.3 but I like to know what version of python is  
>>> better.
>>> Somebody did a benchmark or something ?
>>>
>>
>> I think newer is usually better. Otherwise they might just as well  
>> stop
>> developing :P (kidding)
>>
>> A benchmark wouldn't be that hard. Run pymsn-t for an hour with each
>> python version (eg. by editing the #!/usr/bin/python headers to  
>> contain
>> the version number). Use your favorite utility to look at memery  
>> usage,
>> cpu time, etc. Eg. top, or in gnome System Monitor, or whatever you'd
>> use. Good luck and publish the results ;)
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> py-transports mailing list
>> py-transports@blathersource.org
>> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> py-transports@blathersource.org
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
>
>

Reply via email to