Using 2.3 here, with more than 2000 users online, several instances. On Nov 8, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Gonzalo Barrio wrote:
> I think that not always newer is better, but, I don't remember when > someone said that python2.4 was working slower than 2.3 That's why > my question. > The performance benchmark is if someone has more than 700 > concurrent users. I have only 60 or 80 users online. > I'm gonna do some test with my server. > Anyway are you using 2.4 ? > > Thanks > > Andreas van Cranenburgh wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:06:38PM -0300, Gonzalo Barrio wrote: >> >>> I am using python2.3 but I like to know what version of python is >>> better. >>> Somebody did a benchmark or something ? >>> >> >> I think newer is usually better. Otherwise they might just as well >> stop >> developing :P (kidding) >> >> A benchmark wouldn't be that hard. Run pymsn-t for an hour with each >> python version (eg. by editing the #!/usr/bin/python headers to >> contain >> the version number). Use your favorite utility to look at memery >> usage, >> cpu time, etc. Eg. top, or in gnome System Monitor, or whatever you'd >> use. Good luck and publish the results ;) >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> py-transports mailing list >> py-transports@blathersource.org >> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports >> > > > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > py-transports@blathersource.org > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
