On 08/10/05, James Bunton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 08/10/2005, at 8:43 AM, Steve Ramage wrote: > > 5) I generally have three things connected to my jid at any time: > > Galios: 100 (Notebook) > > Turing: 10 (Windows PC at home) > > Pascal: 5 (Linux PC at home) > > > > Its seems that its only when Galios is online that PyMSNt is online, if > > I sign out PyMSNt signs out to spite the fact that Turing and Pascal > > are > > still online, any ideas? > > > I though the resource stuff was working fine. I'll test it again and > get back to you.
Seems to be okay for me, and I use one resource at work, and two at home (one for real, and the other for dev) -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/ From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 8 15:48:11 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Bunton) Date: Sat Oct 8 15:48:21 2005 Subject: [py-transports] [patch] JEP-0085 support for PyMSNt In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 05/10/2005, at 12:49 AM, Andreas van Cranenburgh wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 08:49:30PM +0200, Andreas van Cranenburgh > wrote: >> But now the PyAIM transport also includes the patch, with some >> modifications, so maybe that version is already good enough to commit? >> >> I think the 'contact closed conversation window' feature would be very >> nice as a future addition though, mainly because right now it shows >> "contact is paying attention" forever. But then I'd have to dive into >> the python part of the transport. Any hints? > > Can you give me an update on this James? Will you commit PyAIMt's > version, which is already in SVN? [1] Or were you waiting for me to > write a new patch, and if so, how would it be different from PyAIMt's > way of doing it? > > [1] > http://svn.blathersource.org/diff.php?repname=pyaim- > t&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fsrc%2Fjabw.py&rev=147&sc=0 I'll get around to committing that at some point before the next release. I also want to support the other chat states (I can do this with MSN). That means a little more work on the patch. I'd also like to make JEP22 more invisible if the person is using chat states. That is, if we detect chat states support, then don't send jabber:x:event tags to that person until the end of the session. --- James
