On 2/26/06, Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > btw. if anyone has a recommendation for a text client to replace imcom...
have you looked at CJC and/or Freetalk? -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/ From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 26 22:54:01 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Vogel) Date: Sun Feb 26 22:53:04 2006 Subject: [py-transports] PyICQ-t - Crash with umlauts and licq Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! There seems to be a problem with licq on the other side. When my chat partner uses licq with encoding "CP 1252" and he sends an umlaut (???????) the ICQ transport goes offline and says: "ICQ connection lost! Reason: [Failure instance: Traceback: exceptions.IndexError, list index out of range]" When the encoding of licq is changed to UTF-8, it works. Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2192 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://modevia.com/pipermail/py-transports/attachments/20060226/54858f8f/smime.bin From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 26 22:57:46 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Vogel) Date: Sun Feb 26 22:56:46 2006 Subject: [py-transports] PyICQ-t - Crash with umlauts and licq In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Additional Information: The licq logfile looks like this: 23:44:47: [SRV] Sending message through server (#17395). 23:44:55: [SRV] Message through server from NAME (12345678). 23:44:58: Error encoding to UTF-16. 23:44:58: [SRV] Sending message through server (#17398). 23:44:58: [SRV] NAME went offline. 23:45:02: [WRN] Connect to NAME (12345678) real ip failed: Transport endpoint is not connected. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2192 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://modevia.com/pipermail/py-transports/attachments/20060226/b651136f/smime.bin From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 12:48:38 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rajnish Bhaskar) Date: Mon Feb 27 12:48:49 2006 Subject: [py-transports] File transfer problems with PyMSNt Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I recently installed PyMSNt 0.11 on a server running alongside ejabberd 1.0 (upgrading from PyMSNt 0.10). I can send files to MSN contacts through my client (Psi 0.10) fine, but when I try to receive, I get this error: "Unable to connect to peer for data transfer Ensure that your Data Transfer settings are proper. If you are behind a NAT router or firewall then you'll need to open the proper TCP port or specify a Data Transfer Proxy in your account settings." The server isn't behind a NAT and port 8010 (where I have FT set up with ftJabberPort) is definitely free (at least, when I put a web server on that port, it's accessible from outside the firewall) I can't find any error in the debug.log when I set it to level 2, but I some stuff that looks relevent at level 3. This can be found at http://lordofthemoon.com/files/pymsntdebug.log Would posting my config.xml file help? TIA, Raj. - -- Mr Rajnish Bhaskar, Technical officer IT Education Unit, University of Glasgow [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.iteu.gla.ac.uk/ - -- Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. -- (Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEAvUm4QHnsKZu8OQRAohOAKCQYfjrVrJ+2Xusdba3P1XKH3zPbwCeN67N CycIOsgqZjyEtCxu+WgRnPY= =WubS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 13:18:40 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stan) Date: Mon Feb 27 13:19:22 2006 Subject: [py-transports] Re: Setting up pymsn-t with jabberd2 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Norman Rasmussen <norman <at> rasmussen.co.za> writes: > On 2/26/06, Stan <jabber <at> acmelab.no-ip.org> wrote: > > btw. if anyone has a recommendation for a text client to replace imcom... > > have you looked at CJC and/or Freetalk? Yep can't get on with freetalk (I suspect that I need more documentation so I can get the most out of it) Finally got all the dependancies in place for CJC and it looks like a winner, I'm not so keen on the multiple buffer method, especially as it's rather shy about telling me someone has tried to chat with me but I'll just get more eagle eyed at watching the active buffer thing. Thanks for the recommendation, though if anyone else knows of any others..?
