Chris, Thanks for caring. A long, long time ago I had dreams of a crew of thousands of PyWikiGnomes, working in teams to curate areas of interest.
While that hasn't happened yet, we can dream. Do feel free to point any other like-minded individuals our way! regards Steve Steve Holden On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Mats Wichmann <m...@wichmann.us> wrote: > On 03/06/2018 02:28 PM, wlavrij...@lbl.gov wrote: > > Chris, > > > > thanks! > > > > For the articles mentioned in the list (about a third into the page > > (1)), all > > of them are ancient (newest from 2003), describing obsolete tech. One > link > > still works and I was able to find a live link for another. Last one > > appears > > to be completely discarded. Similar for the weave page (2), which refers > to > > a project that still exists, but is declared obsolete (all links are > dead). > > > > Any rules for this, or place to discuss? > > Not really. Wikis are like this... time wounds them, and there's nobody > "assigned to maintain". > > Just a personal view: sometimes I'll move an obsolete chunk to its own > section at the bottom of the page with a header that says "this is old > content, links don't work and will be removed eventually unless somebody > resurrects it". Sometimes just throw it out. The wiki is versioned, so > if the decision was wrong, an older version of the page can be recovered. > > > > _______________________________________________ > pydotorg-www mailing list > pydotorg-www@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www >
_______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list pydotorg-www@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www