Hi Chris, the PSF CoC applies to the wiki as well, but I'm not sure I follow your comments regarding the page in question.
This is the version of the page you edited: https://wiki.python.org/moin/DocumentationTools?action=recall&rev=41 It simply says that the package is a maintained fork. I could not find language which suggests that pdoc3 is better than the original and it's certainly not offensive in any way. Could you please clarify ? Thanks, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg Python Software Foundation http://www.python.org/psf/ http://www.malemburg.com/ On 04.05.2019 07:35, Chris Angelico wrote: > Does the main Python COC apply to pages on the wiki? If not, is there > some approximate equivalent that all wiki editors are bound to comply > with? I can't find anything specified. > > The page in question is one that has been the focus of some discussion > already: > https://wiki.python.org/moin/DocumentationTools > > The pdoc3 fork is technically legal, but is offensive in a number of ways: > * The wiki entry (until I edited it just now) implied heavily that > this was the sole fork worth considering > * The documentation at https://pdoc3.github.io/pdoc/ deliberately and > gratuitously sneaks swastikas into the content > * The "What Users Are Saying" section may (unproven) be using quotes > not from users of the software, which (if true) would be > misrepresenting those people > * The overall tone of the page tends towards the caustic and divisive. > > I'm not comfortable with the project in its current state, but am > unsure what, if any, rules have been violated. Seeking advice. > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > pydotorg-www mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www > _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
