> For the CoC issue, and if it does or does not violate the CoC, I think you > should fire this off to p...@python.org. This is where I don't like > intentionally vague guidelines. Yes, they stop schoolkid rule lawyering, > but it does mean we depend on adjudicators quite a bit.
There's never been anything easy about preventing abuse, every approach has its problems - as a large number of problems have found out over the past few years as it seems to have gotten more popular to complain about bad actors (we always _used_ to say "don't feed the trolls", I think it's become more recognized that approach is not really sufficient). in any case, if we believe wiki contributions are covered by the CoC I believe the wiki should say so explicitly. As Chris noted in starting this iteration of the thread, it doesn't. The front page doesn't, the editing guidelines has some bullets but doesn't reference the CoC by name. Editors ought to be told... Also while I agree a CoC should not be too specific, I really think this one is too non-specific, as it doesn't say you have to follow it. "When you're working with members of the community, we encourage you to follow these guidelines" That's a PSF matter, of course, but just sayin'.... _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list pydotorg-www@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
