Hi M Karma, Could you provide more details of the test case, the way your are obtaining the order of accuracy, and the results that you are getting.
Thanks Peter Professor of Computational Fluid Dynamics and EPSRC Fellow Department of Aeronautics Imperial College London South Kensington London SW7 2AZ UK On 6 Oct 2020, at 15:47, mkamra <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello Everyone, I have a question regarding the order of accuracy of the ACM method; Have you done any tests using the method of manufactured solutions ( published or otherwise) ? I tried the 2D taylor green benchmark but the order of accuracy I am getting is nowhere near what it should be. When comparing with exact solution I used the solution points directly not the subdivided solution in the vtu file to avoid interpolation issues polluting the order of accuracy Also regarding the ACM, how would one obtain the residual of the continuity and momentum equations? Pseudo-stats only report the change between two consecutive pseudo iterations Regards, M Kamra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pyfrmailinglist/fc58961d-02b2-4e7b-a05b-62af91f93537n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pyfrmailinglist/fc58961d-02b2-4e7b-a05b-62af91f93537n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pyfrmailinglist/F702AD98-E389-4DDB-8D78-41E3E7199CF2%40ic.ac.uk.
