Thanks! This is sufficient for my purposes, at least for now. As
discussed, I think it makes sense for people who want to export bitmask
functionality to link with bitmask directly. If you want, I could
export some of the methods from mask.c but I don't know if that would be
useful at all.
--Mike
René Dudfield wrote:
Committed revision 1736.
I think it looks ok. Did you want to add anything else to it?
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Michael George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've attached a patch that exposes the mask api in a separate header file.
Right now it only provides the type object. It follows the same convention
as the other exported apis.
--Mike
