Hi, I just got a google alert about this thread. Let me react... Alex wrote: > Given that the only SPE binaries are Python 2.4 though SPE is 100% python, so there are no binaries involved (except of course from wxPython). The installer of python2.4 works as good on python2.5 So why was it called 2.4? Before 2.3 and 2.4 source installers of distutils were not compatible due to some new features. So read it more like 2.4+ SPE does not install its own python interpreter or whatever. So if there is a version mismatch, you should check your python installation.
This confuses me: Steve wrote: > Suffice it to say I'm not having trouble running the hello world under SPE > any more. Alex wrote: > Unfortunately _I_ am still not able to run pyglet under SPE, so the issue > remains... So are you both talking about the same thing? There are different ways of running programs through SPE. Don't try to run pyglets from the shell, there are better options: Tools > Run/Stop with WinPdb for interactivity: This has the advantage that you can pause any moment the execution with the WinPdb debugger to inspect/change variables, give custom python commands, set breakpoints, ... Tools > Run/Stop if you just want to run without interactivity. If there is an exception, there will be links in the output window to jump to the error. Tools > Run in Terminal : Runs your program completely outside SPE. (Of course with interactivity I don't mean between you and your program, but between SPE and your program.) That said, I strongly recommend to use SPE from subversion: svn checkout svn://svn.berlios.de/python/spe/trunk/_spe More info here: http://pythonide.blogspot.com/2007/02/how-to-download-latest-spe-from_26.html There are a lot of major improvements both for Windows, Linux and Mac. Not so much in new features, but in stability. In fact it is really a new release (0.8.4), but I don't find the time to package it. Unfortunately I don't have time yet to play around with pyglets, but it seems very interesting. I might give it a try later. I am looking for a library which can extract the frames of a movie as PIL images on the fly with without storing them on disk and preferably with random access. Is such thing possible with pyglet? Thanks in advance, Stani --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
