2009/8/16 Richard Thomas <[email protected]>: > A decision making process would be nice. We could easily hold such > votes in a invitation only group managed by all the committers. > Preceding vote discussions with a "Vote:" prefix and maintaining a > policy of not posting arguments or points of view in excess of "in > favor" or "not in favor" in such discussions would make the process > quite clean. That's far from complete. There are additional things > needed, like time limits and a consensus on who posts that the vote > finished and whatnot. But the process would be accessible and > transparent and those sound like the most important details.
I'm slightly concerned that you're making a jump here from "decision-making process" to "votes". Democracy is one option for how the project should be run, but I'm not convinced it's the best one. Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
