On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Tartley<[email protected]> wrote:
> Very fair - even though it was me who mentioned the idea of a vote, I
> agree it's not usually a great way to decide. :-)
I'd rather not see a vote. Unity/focus of vision is hard enough as it is.
I'm not sure about endless discussion aspects. For new
directions/features it seems not too bad, maybe.
Since it seems we've deferred changing version control systems, what's
the next step for moving forward on bug fixes?
I'm particular keen to have a testing/release-candidate/validation
process that is separate from discussions about new features and the
next big direction(s).
FWIW last night I ran through a bunch of the self-tests (if that is
the right term), which were the docs/test.py program.
I haven't a clue how to automate them since they're of the form "did
the right thing happen?"; I'm resigned to spending an hour(ish)
running through the test suite for a RC. Annoying, but I think it
should be done, and I'll volunteer to do it on Mac OS X Leopard and
Windows XP Home Edition(1).
Lurker at the threshold,
--Doug
(1) - Cringe, I know. It's an little Acer Netbook; I have it so I can
verify side projects work under XP without using my work laptop which
would risk "Imperial entanglements." :)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pyglet-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
